Prediction of Cedric Pioline vs Jeff Tarango Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Pioline vs J. Tarango

Cedric Pioline

FRA

5

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

118

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$500

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Jeff Tarango

USA

5

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

118

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$500

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Pioline 5 - 0 Tarango

They have played 11 sets in total, with Cedric Pioline winning 10 and Jeff Tarango winning 1. The last match between Cedric Pioline and Jeff Tarango was at the AXA Cup - London, 21-02-2000, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Cedric Pioline getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pioline	5
Tarango	0

Last 5 H2H Matches:

(R2) AXA Cup - London(02-21-00)

Stats

Cedric Pioline

Jeff Tarango

(R1) Open 13 - Marseille(02-01-99)

Stats

Cedric Pioline

Jeff Tarango

(R1) Eurocard Open - Stuttgart(10-20-97)

Stats

Cedric Pioline

Jeff Tarango

C. Pioline vs J. Tarango H2H Profile

C. Pioline	Stats	J. Tarango
$0	Career Prize Money	$500
55.25% (400-324)	Career Total W/L	48.22% (298-320)
5	Indoor	0
5	Titles	4
5	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Pioline vs J. Tarango Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cedric Pioline has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jeff Tarango has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cedric Pioline, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jeff Tarango has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cedric Pioline has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jeff Tarango has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cedric Pioline has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jeff Tarango winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cedric Pioline has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 36/23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 107/98). Jeff Tarango has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 30/27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 14/27).
Player level: In the last year, Cedric Pioline has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jeff Tarango has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Cedric Pioline winning 5 times and Jeff Tarango being victorious 0 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Cedric Pioline winning 10 and Jeff Tarango winning 1.
The last match between Cedric Pioline and Jeff Tarango was at the AXA Cup - London, 21-02-2000, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Cedric Pioline getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cedric Pioline has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jeff Tarango has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cedric Pioline has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jeff Tarango has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cedric Pioline has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jeff Tarango has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cedric Pioline vs Jeff Tarango Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Pioline vs J. Tarango H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Pioline	Stats	J. Tarango
5	H2H Matches Won	0
10	Sets Won	1
67	Games Won	44
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (5/5)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/5)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (5/5)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/5)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/5)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Pioline Recent Matches Played

Empty Result

J. Tarango Recent Matches Played

Empty Result

C. Pioline vs J. Tarango Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Pioline	Stats	J. Tarango
55.25% (400/324)	YTD Win/Loss	48.22% (298/320)
54.45% (1047/876)	Sets Win/Loss	48.14% (751/809)
51.42% (9716/9178)	Games Win/Loss	49.69% (7399/7492)
52.20% (107/98)	Hard Win/Loss	50.00% (153/153)
54.46% (122/102)	Clay Win/Loss	49.23% (64/66)
57.53% (126/93)	Indoor Hard W/L	47.52% (67/74)
59.21% (45/31)	Grass Win/Loss	34.15% (14/27)
0	Aces Total	5
0	Total Double Faults	6
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
285.39	Average Opponent Rank	299.69
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	60% (82/136)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	72% (59/82)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (26/54)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	50% (7/14)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	38% (52/138)
61.29% (76/48)	Slam W/L	38.16% (29/47)
51.35% (76/72)	Masters W/L	43.66% (31/40)
53.33% (8/7)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
55.31% (224/181)	Main Tour W/L	48.70% (206/217)
57.69% (15/11)	Challenger W/L	68.89% (31/14)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/1)
54% (311/578)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (264/538)
61% (85/139)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	41% (32/78)
54% (155/285)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	44% (79/180)
49% (129/264)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (101/204)
84% (382/319)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (290/231)
16% (382/61)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (290/59)
23% (342/79)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (328/66)